Cross examining psychopaths, II

Go perjorative.  Evaluate arrested development age and attack.  They, particularly the ‘young ones’, lack any space between the self and their emotions.  They must respond emotionally.

Why woudn’t he blink? In his own mind he’s only 6-7 years old and he was trying to look like a grownup, Rod Rosenstein

That’s his psychopathic emotional arrested development age.

I’ve always thought that Rod walked and stood with a childish awkwardness.  When considering possible psychopathy, one should notice close to everything.

Background:  Man Shocks America With Unblinking Eyes.  This article closed with:

We know from the discourse around disgraced Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes that not blinking doesn’t necessarily indicate anything about a person’s behavior — but the haunting image of his overall stillness was still a sight to behold.

You mean super psycho, probable pseudologue, Elizabeth Holmes?

Psychopathfree from the wayback machine

https://web.archive.org/web/20160812143709/https://www.psychopathfree.com/

Anyone know why it’s not back yet?  In 2016, or so, the author took it private (why not read only?) while he wrote a book. https://www.psychopathfree.com/articles/whole-again-a-new-book-by-jackson-mackenzie.31

3 words of advice to Miranda Lambert: annulment, annulment, annulment

Did Miranda Lambert just fall for an emotionally shape shifting reptiloid psychopathic con artist?  Could be.

https://www.bing.com/search?q=site%3Apeople.com+lambert+mcloughlin&go=Search&qs=n&form=QBRE&sp=-1&pq=site%3Apeople.com+la&sc=0-18&sk=&cvid=04875EEF625B4E5BB98307F0A71999AC

I understand his previous engagement to be married was called off a few months ago when his pregnant mistress, who was living with his parents, called his bride to be. https://people.com/country/miranda-lambert-husband-brendan-mcloughlin-previously-engaged/

Christine Onassis and Britney Spears went down a similar path.  During the breakup when Ms. Spears cut her hair short and started acting strangely many people thought she was going insane.  Actually she was on a journey to reclaim her sanity and her behavior was a sign of health.

Annulment on the grounds of false pretenses at this stage would be easier .

Finally, I see Brendan McLoughlin is an NYPD officer.  In my opinion the NYPD has a huge problem with psychopathy (including don iguana romeos (don ‘guanas)) in the ranks and needs to get a handle on it.  Psychopaths are sometimes called reptilian or reptiloid because they are emotionless, their seeming emotions are just to fool the fools.  (That’s mean of me actually, confidence artists are called that because they are extremely convincing.  That’s the whole problem.  Oh well . . .)

Psychopathic conwoman’s pity play fails to derail Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court bid

I’m sorry, but I didn’t believe Dr. Christine Blasey Ford for a second.  I saw a psychopath hiding behind big glasses and hair bangs while she dealt out her pity play (probably professionally written by a novelist).  The glasses and bangs made it a little difficult.  One should look for ‘flashes’ of contempt and arrogance, moments of ‘stepping out of character’ to test the emotional effect, etc. — the glasses and bangs (psychopaths very often wear glasses to hide their machinations) made it almost impossible to notice these things.  However for me, her voice (‘I’m just a fragile flower, woe is me’) and emotions (delivered on cue and ceasing as quickly as they came on) didn’t ring true at all.

For grief, you want to see autonomous behaviors.  Watch vets discuss fallen comrades.  First they lose control of their bottom lip.  Then the voice.  Then the nose turns red and runs and/or tears flow.  This matched Brett Kavanaugh’s behavior, not Ford’s.  Now of course, one can always be wrong.  If I were a betting man I would bet 10,000 dollars on the above, but not a 100,000.  However I would bet that 100,000 on the psychopathic and/or psuedologic and/or seriously disturbed mental state of the other two claimants, Deborah Ramirez and Julie Swetnick.

Kavanaugh was lucky that for psychopaths, less is never more.  They can’t resist guilding the lily.  If one charge is good then a hundred over the top charges are even better.  Ms. Ramirez’s and Ms. Swetnick’s allegations actually weakened the attack on Kavanaugh’s character.

However the multiple charges were designed to enable Feinstein’s feigned incredulousness of “you mean you are calling all three liars?!!”  “Exactly!”  Dianne Feinstein is not a psychopath, but in my opinion, morally corrupt and bankrupt, distilled evil, 200 proof.  The corrupt always ally with the psychopaths – they form an eternal tag team.

We’ve seen this game played before, the 11th hour unprovable, undisprovable charges, against Roy Moore, The psychopathic gang stalking of Judge Roy Moore.   The Republican Party made a moral and strategic error in not going to the mat for the judge.  This later attack on Kavanaugh would never have happened.

In terms of the rallying cry of “Believe Survivors,” I can only say that I recall the similar cry of “Believe the Children”.  That campaign resulted in the personal destruction and imprisonment of numerous absolutely innocent of the charges adults affiliated with the McMartin Preschool facility.  Psychopathy played a role here also, with a psychopathic D.A.  (The McMartin Preschool hysteria.)  Lesson learned:  fantastic, fantabulous charges should always be accompanied by a request that the ones making the allegations prove they are not psychopaths.

To keep Brett Kavanaugh from being eternally damaged goods in the eyes of his opponents and much of America, the three accusers should be invited to prove just that.  This, they won’t do — so the argument should be made directly.  If any DNA is available it should be tested (though this area is a little murky).  If any committed provable perjury they and their attorneys should be pursued legally (it’s worth noting that psychopaths almost always have psychopathic attorneys).  For example there is a serious allegation that Dr. Ford is an expert on polygraph tests and has coached others on taking lie detector tests.  This should be pursued to see where the truth lies.

Psychopaths move through life like sharks through the water, but only because no one calls them on their behavior.  “Hello, I’d like to introduce myself, my name is . . .”, welcome to my blog.

A hearsay tale involving Andrew Cuomo

Hearsay can’t be considered evidence.  But individuals are certainly free to decide if they believe a particular hearsay account to be more likely true or more likely false.  This story is at one level of hearsay (to me, and two levels to you), there is an individual who alleges to have been an eye/ear witness to alleged bragging by Andrew Cuomo, then there is the individual who relayed the story to me.  I trust my source did not make up this account, and I believe my source believes his source — the foregoing doesn’t necessarily mean anything but I want to add it to the mix.

If I could suggest how others approach the following, I’d suggest the these questions.  Does this account square with what you know of Mr. Cuomo, either personally or from the public record?  Could you see him planning and doing the following?  Is he Machiavellian enough?  If so, could you see him wishing to brag about it?  Is he arrogant enough to commit to such a strategy?  Etc.

This account, involving his divorce, goes as follows.  Nobody, of course, wants a divorce to publicly devolve into a blackmail contest of mutual dirt slinging and airing of dirty laundry.  Particularly not a politician.

Allegedly, Andrew Cuomo and his wife agreed to a trial separation, with a stated (not in writing) agreement that sex with others was acceptable.  A setup for a trap?  Mr. Cuomo allegedly then hired a private detective to follow his soon to be ex-wife.  At an appropriate time to catch his wife in flagrante delicto, alledgedly the private detective and Mr. Cuomo burst into the hotel room (or whereever), cameras in hand and flashes a-poppin’.  Voila, a nice quiet divorce.

What’s your opinion, could you see Andrew doing such?  Is he the type of personality that would want to brag about it?

Would you want him to wield facial recognition/AI tracking powers?  https://www.vocativ.com/396745/memo-new-york-called-for-face-recognition-cameras-at-bridges-tunnels/index.htmlhttps://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-07-21/big-brother-surveillance-begins-cuomo-unveils-facial-scanning-new-york-toll-plazas.

After the last election, I recall Mr. Cuomo being asked what he thought of Ms. Teachout.  Paraphrased from memory, ‘Ahh, political season.  Gotta love it.  Opinions, everyone has one’ and then laughed.  Let me translate that from psychopath-speak.  He was calling her an asshole.  The complete phrase, of course, is ‘opionions are like assholes, everyone has one.’  I’m sure all the other psychopaths laughed too.

Then there is his latest “America was never great”  flap.  Psychopaths in the thrall of groupthink are dangerous, they easily lose the thread.  He and his advisors no doubt thought they were destroying Trumps’ trump card, his ‘Make America Great Again‘ campaign.

Finally, on Andrew, have you noticed his voice?  Its very ugly.  I believe he lacks the empathic soul that animates a normal human voice.

Moving on, how about Chris?

 Fox News host Tucker Carlson poked fun at CNN’s Chris Cuomo Friday, playing a bizarre video Cuomo posted on Instagram.  . . .

In Cuomo’s video, he makes a few vague comments about last summer’s “Wonder Woman” movie before making air kisses.

Cuomo says, “‘Wonder Woman,’ amazing. We finally had a female director of break the $100 million mark. The film means more than just its box score. What does it mean to you? Here’s a little intrigue–I wanted to be like Wonder Woman, and I’m gonna wear a shirt that says it.”

“What does it qualify as intrigue that Chris Cuomo wanted to be Wonder Woman? Did he ever wear that shirt? What’s with the air kisses? There are so many more questions,” Carlson said.

He sarcastically continued, “It’s better to understand Chris Cuomo for who he is. An artist, poet, seeker, shaman. The question is not, what the hell is Chris talking about, but what is Chris Cuomo trying to teach us, all of us, humanity itself?”  http://dailycaller.com/2017/10/14/tucker-plays-bizarre-clip-of-cnns-chris-cuomo-talking-total-nonsense-video/

At what age does an child’s gender identity solidify?  It would seem that significant parts of Chris’s personality are arrested prior to that point.

More, CNN’s Chris Cuomo Excuses Antifa’s Violence Because ‘All Punches Are Not Equal . . .’ —  Chris Cuomo: We At CNN Can Possess WikiLeaks Emails, But You Can’t —  CNN’s Chris Cuomo: ‘Fake news’ insult ‘equivalent of the N-word Uh, . . ., guys, gals,  . . .

Finally, if someone would give me a toothbrush from each of Mario, Andrew and Chris plus 15 thousand dollars, I’ll give you the Cuomo bloodline, the Cuomo psychopathic bloodline.

They don’t bother to hide it, do they?

Sarah Palin blasts Sacha Baron Cohen, says she was fooled into doing interview

Nobody likes being slimed by a psychopath.

“‘I was shocked it was so easy’: ​meet the professor who says facial recognition ​​can tell if you’re gay”.

This individual who doesn’t believe in guilt or free will should turn his AI photo machine loose on faces like his own.

Panic At The Disco’s Brendon Urie comes out as pansexual: ‘It’s just people I’m attracted to’

‘It’s not the sex of the individual, it’s the person’ (paraphrased).  That’s deep, man, deep.  Yeah, love the one your with!  Plus, all cats are gray in the dark!