Welcome. If you think the world has gone crazy, you are at the right spot. I believe I know exactly what is wrong (well, at least to 80-85%). Psychopaths believe they are in ascendancy. Though this may be hard to believe, they are an intermarrying, con artist, cheater strategist, intraspecies predator human alternate, loyal only to each other. https://pathwhisperer.info/2015/11/18/post-redux-a…
They even push biological male psychopaths into female sports, having no innate sense of gender, plus no honor, real pride or shame. For them it’s all about possessing the trophy, justly earning the trophies is meaningless. https://pathwhisperer.info/2022/06/24/nutters-in-c…
Moreover, I believe the psychopath nation is 1), united behind the notavaccine for neurotypicals (that’s us, those with empathy). It seems this is a matter of existential importance to them — will the genetic engineering/ long covid brain damage help keep them hidden? They are truly desperate. 2), united behind open borders and the extinction of America as a nation (I believe Mayorkas is himself a psychopath). 3), united behind the WEF New World Order. Seeing us as prawns, I mean pawns, they eagerly await WEF’s soulless and godless Yuval Harari’s ‘human hacking’ of ‘useless eaters’ and Klaus Schwab’s neoslavery (‘You will own nothing and be happy’). 4), their hatred of Trump knows no bounds, I assume due to his MAGA anti globalism.
Make no mistake about it, they want to want to cripple us (or worse ) with the notavaccine. As do the WEF elite. Covid, the spike protein and the mRNA vaxx are the greatest crime/evil in the history of the world.
Please help me spread the truth plus search for the best way to recognize psychopaths. Brain scans, both structural and functional, will do it. But we need a genetic test. If freed by donations to spend the time I believe I can find this information. Most psychopathy researchers are themselves psychopathic, imo, making this search more difficult.
I have written a blog on psychopaths since 2008. I want to take it to the next level. I need your help. Thank you for your time. Bitcoin top right, credit cards bottom right.
Note the top brain slice, specifically the butterfly shaped hole and the brain structure dividing the two halves, the pellucidum septum. The septum is divided in the middle by an opening, the cavum.
Psychopathy marker — “Neurodevelopmental marker for limbic maldevelopment in antisocial personality disorder and psychopathy”
“Illustration of normal septum pellucidum (thin membrane separating the lateral ventricles) in a non-antisocial control (a) and the cavum septum pellucidum in an individual with antisocial personality disorder (b).
Coronal magnetic resonance image slices are at the level of the head of the anterior limb of the internal capsule, caudate, putamen, accumbens, and insula. Highlighted within the bue box is the septum pellucidum, dividing the lateral ventricles and bordered superiorly by the body of the corpus callosum and inferiorly by the fornix. The normal control (a) shows a fused septum pellucidum, whereas the participant with antisocial personality disorder (b) shows a fluid-filled cavum inside the two leaflets of the septum pellucidum.”
Yes, but only for the Munchkins. For the WEFster One World Dictatorship engineers one more lasso to coral the dumb masses.
The Munchkins: “Wow, Rev. Jim Jones sure is wonderful. Give me some more Koolaid please.”
The WEF engineers: “Gawd, why are people born so stupid!! Muah, ha, ha, muah, ha, ha, ha.”
This is a cloth woven from a single thread. Get us to love our servitude for a higher goal. For them, destroy family farming and monopolize all food production and profits. Deprive us of high quality proteins — stunting our resistance to the pseudo vax and its hidden ingredients? ‘Plant milk’ is a contradiction in terms. Do they want to stunt us?
These insane WEF gluttons want all the money/power in the universe. And they have the power to do it. WEF’s Klaus Schwab (and his cutout Ida Auken): “You will own nothing, have no privacy, and be happy”. So they have to take what we have now or get us to voluntarily give up everything.
The insanity doesn’t stop there. CO2 cannot possibly be a greenhouse gas. Ground loving, heavier than air. Plants love it, incorporate the carbon, free the O2. You couldn’t make this stuff up. But the coordinated, synchronized elito-liars are totally confident (their confidence is part of the con) in fooling the Munchkins.
Where is Prof. Feynman when you need him? He wouldn’t have put up with this nonsense for a second, disprovable by a desk top experiment. Say opening a box of Omaha Steaks and watching the CO2 dry ice cascade to the floor. Feynman went before Congress, dunked a piece of O-ring in ice water and cracked it, to demonstrate the cause of the Challenger disaster. (Which I had warned against the night before, I’ll have you know.)
The manuscript surveys the history of psychopathic personality, from its origins in psychiatric folklore to its modern assessment in the forensic arena. Individuals with psychopathic personality, or psychopaths, have a disproportionate impact on the criminal justice system. Psychopaths are twenty to twenty-five times more likely than non-psychopaths to be in prison, four to eight times more likely to violently recidivate compared to non-psychopaths, and are resistant to most forms of treatment. This article presents the most current clinical efforts and neuroscience research in the field of psychopathy. Given psychopathy’s enormous impact on society in general and on the criminal justice system in particular, there are significant benefits to increasing awareness of the condition. This review also highlights a recent, compelling and cost-effective treatment program that has shown a significant reduction in violent recidivism in youth on a putative trajectory to psychopathic personality.
Psychopaths consume an astonishingly disproportionate amount of criminal justice resources. The label psychopath is often used loosely by a variety of participants in the system—police, victims, prosecutors, judges, probation officers, parole and prison officials, even defense lawyers—as a kind of lay synonym for incorrigible. Law and psychiatry, even at the zenith of their rehabilitative optimism, both viewed psychopaths as a kind of exception that proved the rehabilitative rule. Psychopaths composed that small but embarrassing cohort whose very resistance to all manner of treatment seemed to be its defining characteristic.
Psychopathy is a constellation of psychological symptoms that typically emerges early in childhood and affects all aspects of a sufferer’s life including relationships with family, friends, work, and school. The symptoms of psychopathy include shallow affect, lack of empathy, guilt and remorse, irresponsibility, and impulsivity (see Table 1 for a complete list of psychopathic symptoms). [ . . . . ]
Table 1
The 20 Items Listed on the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (Hare 1991; 2003)
The items corresponding to the early two-factor conceptualization of psychopathy,89 subsequent three-factor model,90 and current four-factor model are listed.91 The two-factor model labels are Interpersonal-Affective (Factor 1) and Social Deviance (Factor 2); the three-factor model labels are Arrogant and Deceitful Interpersonal Style (Factor 1); Deficient Affective Experience (Factor 2), and Impulsive and Irresponsible Behavioral Style (Factor 3); the four-factor model labels are Interpersonal (Factor 1), Affective (Factor 2), Lifestyle (Factor 3), and Antisocial (Factor 4). Items indicated with “–” did not load on any factor.
Psychopathy is astonishingly common as mental disorders go. It is twice as common as schizophrenia, anorexia, bipolar disorder, and paranoia,5 and roughly as common as bulimia, panic disorder, obsessive-compulsive personality disorder, and narcissism.6 Indeed, the only mental disorders significantly more common than psychopathy are those related to drug and alcohol abuse or dependence, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder.
[. . . .]
A BRIEF HISTORY OF PSYCHOPATHY
A. Emptied Souls
The idea that some humans are inherent free riders without moral scruple seems to have become controversial only in the postmodern era, when it has become fashionable to deny that any of us have a “nature” at all. For as long as humans have roamed the Earth, we have noticed that there are people who seem to be what psychiatrist Adolf Guggenbühl-Craig called “emptied souls.”17 One of Aristotle’s students, Theophrastus, was probably the first to write about them, calling them “the unscrupulous.”18These are people who lack the ordinary connections that bind us all and lack the inhibitions that those connections impose. They are, to over simplify, people without empathy or conscience.
Psychopathy has always been part of human society; that is evident from its ubiquity in history’s myths and literature.19 Greek and Roman mythology is strewn with psychopaths, Medea being the most obvious.20 Psychopaths populate the Bible, at least the Old Testament, perhaps beginning with Cain. Psychopaths have appeared in a steady stream of literature from all cultures since humans first put pen to paper: from King Shahyar in The Book of One Thousand and One Nights;21 to the psychopaths in Shakespeare, including Richard III and, perhaps most chillingly, Aaron the Moor in Titus Andronicus; to the villain Ximen Qing in the 17th century Chinese epic Jin Ping Mei, The Golden Vase.22 More recent sightings in film and literature include Macheath, from Berthold Brecht’s Three Penny Opera, Alex DeLarge in Anthony Burgess’ A Clockwork Orange, and Hannibal Lecter in Silence of the Lambs.23
No cultures, or stations, are immune. One of the modern fathers of the clinical study of psychopathy, Hervey Cleckley, famously opined that the Athenian general Alcibiades was probably a psychopath.24 And of course there was the Roman emperor Caligula. But psychopaths much more typically come from the ranks of the ordinary. Cleckley wrote extensively about ordinary patients he classified as having severe forms of psychopathy and whom he opined were almost all “plainly unsuited for life in any community; some are as thoroughly incapacitated, in my opinion, as most patients with unmistakable schizophrenic psychosis.”25 But he also examined patients who were highly functioning businessmen—men of the world as he put it—scientists, physicians and even psychiatrists. These people were able to navigate the demands of modern society, despite having the same clinical constellations as their less-functioning brethren, including grandiosity, impulsivity, remorselessness and shallow affect. These functioning psychopaths have become the objects of much recent attention.26
Although in this article we will focus on research efforts in the U.S. and Canada, psychopathy is a worldwide problem. In 1995, NATO commissioned an Advanced Study Institute on Psychopathic Behavior, the scientific director of which was Robert Hare, whose seminal clinical assessment instrument is discussed in detail in Part II below.27 One of the important collections on psychopathy, cited throughout this article, was the product of a 1999 meeting held under the auspices of the Queen of Spain and her Center for the Study of Violence.28 Also discussed below29 is the British practice of expressly addressing the problem of the psychopath in commitment statutes in ways that have been generally more aggressive, at least theoretically, than is done in North America.
Psychopaths also appear in existing preindustrial societies, suggesting they are not a cultural artifact of the demands of advancing civilization but have been with us since our emergence as a species. For example, the Yorubas, a tribe indigenous to southwestern Nigeria, call their psychopaths aranakan, which they describe as meaning “a person who always goes his own way regardless of others, who is uncooperative, full of malice, and bullheaded.”30 Inuits have a word, kunlangeta, that they use to describe someone whose “mind knows what to do but he does not do it,” and who repeatedly lies, steals, cheats, and rapes.31
While the capacity to identify with the thoughts and feelings of fellow human beings undoubtedly has innumerable cultural variations, it is beginning to be clear that evolution has built into the human brain a central core of moral reasoning that is more or less universal.32 It is that central core that is missing in psychopaths.
The sociopath can sit still, inhibit immediate aims, defer gratification [‘to a degree’, ‘enough to pass’, corresponding to their location on the SAPness (socially adept psychopath) scale.What all psychopaths have in common, is not liking or wanting to restrain themselves. PW]. Indeed, if he did not have these abilities (which most latency-age children also have), people would not confuse him with an adult even with his adult-looking body (which most latency-age children do not have, and which has more to do with why latency-age children are not confused with adults than people realize). [So, Kegan is saying that it is the sociopath’s adult looking body that gets him into the door of adult life which he is actually unsuited for and absolutely untrustworthy in. I agree of course.]
43. For example, Robert Kegan has posited, based in part on EEG studies, that psychopathy is caused by an abnormally slow rate of brain development, and that psychopaths, in effect, are frozen in time with the egocentricity, impulsiveness, selfishness, and unwillingness to delay gratification of normal adolescents. Kegan Robert G. The Child Behind the Mask: Sociopathy as Developmental Delay. In: Reid William H, et al., editors. Unmasking the Psychopath: Antisocial Personality and Related Syndromes. Vol. 45. 1986. [Google Scholar]. Though this explanation might be consistent with parts of the paralimbic thesis discussed in Part V below, it is clinically inconsistent with the fact that signs of psychopathy have been detected in very young, preadolescent, children. As Hare put it, “[F]ew parents of a ten-year-old psychopath would confuse him or her with an ordinary ten-year-old.” Hare, Without Conscience supra note 40, at 169.
The way I look at things, his eyes are ‘all wrong’ (a scientific term I need to define, any day now). Arrogant, childish, seemingly unbridled liar (or true blue believer), etc., etc. Hate filled.
Psychopaths simply can’t comprehend that laws, procedures, or constitutionality matter. They consider all that a false front. Only the decision maker’s wishes matters. The same seems true for Mayorkas.
Possible co members, but I’ll bow to AI:
Danny Danon
Shahar Azani (right)
I ended up with the above two while looking over the Israeli high command for obvious at a glance (let’s say 80%+ suspicion) psychopaths. [True joke at my expense, I’ve wondered about these two for a long time, but I not only had them confused, I thought they were the same person. So each time, I was like ‘That’s funny, I thought his name was [the other name]’. Ha, ha, ha. Must be the long covid . . .]
Any way, normies in the IDF should take command, imo, and purge the IDF, as starters, of psychopaths. I’m convinced that indepth of knowledge of psychopathy can be found in Tel Aviv and Hebrew Universities. Though it might hard to ferret out. Maybe they could follow the slime trail of the wormin, HU’s Yuval Harari. Just a suggestion. [Wormin, vermin, get it?]
Back to Mayorkas, in my opinion, the psychopathic community (the Psychopath Nation?) in the US is 99% behind open borders (i.e., the extinction of America), for the WEF New World Order, anti-Trump, pro the body snatcher vaxx for normies. All for the same reason, their own protection (including protecting their essentially hidden status).
… a method of operation by the Ministry for State Security for an efficacious struggle against subversive activities, particularly in the treatment of operations. With Zersetzung one can influence hostile and negative individuals across different operational political activities, especially the hostile and negative aspects of their dispositions and beliefs, so these are abandoned and changed little by little, and, if applicable, the contradictions and differences between the hostile and negative forces would be laid open, exploited, and reinforced.
The goal of Zersetzung is the fragmentation, paralysis, disorganization, and isolation of the hostile and negative forces, in order to preventatively impede the hostile and negative activities, to largely restrict, or to totally avert them, and if applicable to prepare the ground for a political and ideological reestablishment.
Zersetzung is equally an immediate constitutive element of “operational procedures” and other preventive activities to impede hostile gatherings. The principal force employed to implement Zersetzung are the unofficial collaborators. Zersetzung presupposes information and significant proof of hostile activities planned, prepared, and accomplished as well as anchor points corresponding to measures of Zersetzung.
Zersetzung must be produced on the basis of a root cause analysis of the facts and the exact definition of a concrete goal. Zersetzung must be executed in a uniform and supervised manner; its results must be documented.
The political explosive force of Zersetzung heightens demands regarding the maintenance of secrecy.[12]
The term Zersetzung is generally translated into English as “decomposition”, although it can be variously translated as “decay”, “corrosion”, “undermining”, “biodegradation”, or “dissolution”. The term was first used in a prosecutorial context in Nazi Germany, namely as part of the term Wehrkraftzersetzung (or Zersetzung der Wehrkraft). In Western parlance, Zersetzung can be described as the active application of psychological destabilisation procedures by the State apparatus
[. . . . . . . ]
British journalist Luke Harding [. . .], writes in his book:
As applied by the Stasi, Zersetzung is a technique to subvert and undermine an opponent [all boldings in red are commonalities between the STASI and the NYPD, as I see them. However these actions may be unknown to the commisioner (so called), more later]. The aim was to disrupt the target’s private or family life so they are unable to continue their “hostile-negative” activities towards the state. Typically, the Stasi would use collaborators to garner details from a victim’s private life. They would then devise a strategy to “disintegrate” the target’s personal circumstances—their career, their relationship with their spouse, their reputation in the community. They would even seek to alienate them from their children. […] The security service’s goal was to use Zersetzung to “switch off” regime opponents. After months and even years of Zersetzung a victim’s domestic problems grew so large, so debilitating, and so psychologically burdensome that they would lose the will to struggle against the East German state. Best of all, the Stasi’s role in the victim’s personal misfortunes remained tantalisingly hidden. The Stasioperations were carried out in complete operational secrecy. The service acted like an unseen and malevolent god, manipulating the destinies of its victims.
It was in the mid-1970 that Honecker’s secret police began to employ these perfidious methods. At that moment the GDR was finally achieving international respectability. […] Honecker’s predecessor, Walter Ulbricht, was an old-fashioned Stalinist thug. He used open terror methods to subdue his post-war population: show trials, mass arrests, camps, torture and the secret police.
But two decades after east Germany had become a communist paradise of workers and peasants, most citizens were acquiescent. When a new group of dissidents began to protest against the regime, Honecker came to the conclusion that different tactics were needed. Mass terror was no longer appropriate and might damage the GDR’s international reputation. A cleverer strategy was called for. […] The most insidious aspect of Zersetzung is that its victims are almost invariably not believed.[21]
__________________
Use against individuals
The Stasi applied Zersetzung before, during, after, or instead of incarcerating the targeted individual. The implementation of Zersetzung—euphemistically called Operativer Vorgang (“operational procedure”)—generally did not aim to gather evidence against the target in order to initiate criminal proceedings. Rather, the Stasi considered Zersetzung as a separate measure to be used when official judiciary procedures were undesirable for political reasons, such as the international image of the GDR.[38][39] However, in certain cases, the Stasi did attempt to entrap individuals, as for example in the case of Wolf Biermann: The Stasi set him up with minors, hoping that they could then pursue criminal charges.[40] The crimes targeted for such entrapment were non-political, such as drug possession, trafficking, theft, financial fraud, and rape.[41]
“…the Stasi often used a method which was really diabolic. It was called Zersetzung, and it’s described in another guideline. The word is difficult to translate because it means originally “biodegradation.” But actually, it’s a quite accurate description. The goal was to destroy secretly the self-confidence of people, for example by damaging their reputation, by organizing failures in their work, and by destroying their personal relationships. Considering this, East Germany was a very modern dictatorship. The Stasi didn’t try to arrest every dissident. It preferred to paralyze them, and it could do so because it had access to so much personal information and to so many institutions.” —Hubertus Knabe, German historian[42]
Directive 1/76 lists the following as tried and tested forms of Zersetzung, among others:
a systematic degradation of reputation, image, and prestige on the basis of true, verifiable and discrediting information together with untrue, credible, irrefutable, and thus also discrediting information; a systematic engineering of social and professional failures to undermine the self-confidence of individuals; … engendering of doubts regarding future prospects; engendering of mistrust and mutual suspicion within groups …; interrupting or impeding the mutual relations within a group in space or time …, for example by … assigning geographically distant workplaces.
— Directive No. 1/76 of January 1976 for the development of “operational procedures”.[43]
Beginning with intelligence obtained by espionage, the Stasi established “sociograms” and “psychograms” which it applied for the psychological forms of Zersetzung. They exploited personal traits, such as homosexuality, as well as supposed character weaknesses of the targeted individual—for example a professional failure, negligence of parental duties, pornographic interests, divorce, alcoholism, dependence on medications, criminal tendencies, passion for a collection or a game, or contacts with circles of the extreme right—or even the veil of shame from the rumors poured out upon one’s circle of acquaintances.[44][45] From the point of view of the Stasi, the measures were the most fruitful when they were applied in connection with a personality; all “schematism” had to be avoided.[44]
Tactics and methods employed under Zersetzung generally involved the disruption of the victim’s private or family life. This often included psychological attacks, in a form of gaslighting. Other practices included property damage, sabotage of cars, purposely incorrect medical treatment, smear campaigns including sending falsified compromising photos or documents to the victim’s family, denunciation, provocation, psychological warfare, psychological subversion, wiretapping, and bugging.[46]
It has been investigated, but not definitely established, that the Stasi used X-ray devices in a directed and weaponised manner to cause long-term health problems in its opponents.[47] That said, Rudolf Bahro, Gerulf Pannach, and Jürgen Fuchs, three important dissidents who had been imprisoned at the same time, died of cancer within an interval of two years.[22] A study by the Federal Commissioner for the Records of the State Security Service of the former GDR (Bundesbeauftragte für die Unterlagen des Staatssicherheitsdienstes der ehemaligen Deutschen Demokratischen Republik or BStU) has meanwhile rejected on the basis of extant documents such as fraudulent use of X-rays, and only mentions isolated and unintentional cases of the harmful use of sources of radiation, for example to mark documents [microwave weaponry].[48]
In the name of the target, the Stasi made little announcements, ordered products, and made emergency calls, to terrorize them.[49][50] To threaten or intimidate or cause psychoses the Stasi assured itself of access to the target’s living quarters and left visible traces of its presence, by adding, removing, and modifying objects such as the socks in one’s drawer, or by altering the time that an alarm clock was set to go off.[51][41]
Use against groups and social relations
The Stasi manipulated relations of friendship, love, marriage, and family by anonymous letters, telegrams and telephone calls as well as compromising photos, often altered.[52] In this manner, parents and children were supposed to systematically become strangers to one another.[53] To provoke conflicts and extramarital relations the Stasi put in place targeted seductions by Romeo agents [elsewhere I’ve used the terms ‘lizard loverboys’, ‘Don Iguanas’, etc. Currently I’m leaning toward ‘NYPD bonobo rat lizard alien hybrids’, or similar.].[40] An example of this was of this was the attempted seduction of Ulrike Poppe by Stasi agents who tried to break down her marriage.[54]
For the Zersetzung of groups, it infiltrated them with unofficial collaborators, sometimes minors.[55] The work of opposition groups was hindered by permanent counter-propositions and discord on the part of unofficial collaborators when making decisions.[56] To sow mistrust within the group, the Stasi made believe that certain members were unofficial collaborators; moreover by spreading rumors and manipulated photos,[57] the Stasi feigned indiscretions with unofficial collaborators, or placed members of targeted groups in administrative posts to make others believe that this was a reward for the activity of an unofficial collaborator.[40] They even aroused suspicions regarding certain members of the group by assigning privileges, such as housing or a personal car.[40] Moreover, the imprisonment of only certain members of the group gave birth to suspicions.[56]
As in the case of groups, the Zersetzung of individuals had the aim of ‘switching off’ that person’s efficacy by undermining their confidence and their belief in the value of their activities. The Stasi did not usually care whether an individual was switched off through disillusionment, fear, burn-out or mental illness: all outcomes were acceptable, and people’s mental health and social standing during or after an operation were of no concern to the officers involved.
Worrying about informants
The Stasi made little secret of the fact that they used informants, and in fact deliberately helped spread rumours about informants. This was the cheapest and most efficient way to incapacitate individuals and groups.
The Zersetzung of individuals was usually carried out by systematically undermining the target’s quality of life (both socially and in the workplace) with the intention of simply destroying the target’s confidence. The tactics took various forms, such as spreading slanderous rumours, causing trouble at work etc. Rumours and information (such as about unacceptable political viewpoints, inappropriate behaviour, the possibility they may be an informant etc) that were passed on to work colleagues, bosses and social circles might be based on true facts, but were often plausible untruths that were difficult or impossible to refute.
The first stage of Zersetzung was a comprehensive evaluation of state-held data and information, eg medical records, school reports, police records, intelligence reports, searches of target’s residence. At this point they were looking for any weak points (social, emotional or physical) that could be used to put pressure on the target, eg extra-marital affairs, criminal records, alcoholism, drug use, differences between the target and their group (eg age, class, clothing styles) that could be exploited to socially isolate them.
After this a detailed Zersetzung strategy was drawn up: What was the specific aim?What tactics should be used to exploit the target’s personal situation and character traits? What was the timescale?
The next stage was often to supplement covert surveillance with overt observation in order to communicate to the target that they were of interest to the Stasi and to create a sense of insecurity and paranoia. Tactics included questioning, repeated stop and searches, strange noises on telephone lines, conspicuous visits to the workplace so that bosses and colleagues were aware of the police interest etc.
The final stages entailed psychological and physical harassment: moving things around at home (one morning the alarm clock goes off at 5am instead of 7am, and the socks are in the wrong drawer, there’s no coffee left …); damage to bikes and vehicles (eg slashing tyres); the spreading of rumours as mentioned above; ordering goods and making appointments in target’s name etc.
Families were often used as leverage against activists at this stage – either as a method of blackmail (eg family members subjected to oppression as a way of putting indirect pressure on the activist), or persuasion (“your daughter will land in deep trouble if she remains involved in that group, can’t you make her see sense? It’s her career at stake …”).
Physical harassment often included repeated arrests, physical attacks on the street (eg by plain clothes officers), or abuse and assault could be incited by the rumours that had been spread (eg bullying at work, avoidance by neighbours).
I have no idea what the psychopathic word salad means. Nor do I know if the author knows.
I suspect that this was sent by a psychopathic NYPD officer (but with less than complete certainty). Perhaps OfficerDogBiscuitBathDoorwayPricewise85thStBroadwayProtbySgtKlimkoskiProtbyClownCar IABLieutGaraCrewofDPL8171.
the revisionist history around vaccines is getting pretty extreme. let’s be VERY clear:
yes, they were promised to stop spread, contagion, and provide herd immunity.
yes, those promises were made by the same “experts” currently claiming “vaccines were never supposed to stop spread, just reduce severity.”
yes, they were so committed to this that they literally changed the definition of “herd immunity” to EXCLUDE natural immunity.
(of course, they then changed the definition of “vaccine” as well to make this look like less of a failure)
and yes, all the unprecedented lock down and mask up policies were pushed explicitly as “only necessary until we get the vaccines.”
despite the massive PR offensive underway to deny this, these are the facts.
this is what they sold us.
and we have the receipts.
i’m going to compile them here so people have them. if you have more, please drop links in the comments. this is information that needs to be preserved instead of whitewashed out of existence.
let’s start with this compilation from always on point gatopal™ and rational ground stalwart justin hart who in his inimitable wa
let’s start with this compilation from always on point gatopal™ and rational ground stalwart justin hart who in his inimitable way, once more skewers the fauci follies from CNBC yesterday.
watch the video. it’s a doozie.
Dr. Fauci on CNBC Host: "I wonder whether you felt there had been a communication error…" Fauci: "Well I think it was the question of what people interpreted…" pic.twitter.com/H1O63IAlez
this new tale of “communication errors” is a complete fabrication.
tony could not have been more clear. in fact, this whole “vaccinated people become dead ends for the virus and cannot spread it” talking point was his invention. they are his words.
and these words rapidly appeared in the mouths of this whole team of panacea pushers as they stridently advocated for a solution they clearly did not understand.
he repeated them over and over.
they popped out of walensky’s mouth immediately.
Our data from the CDC suggests that vaccinated people don’t carry the virus, don’t get sick and that it’s not just in clinical trials, but it’s also in real world data.” – CDC Director Rochelle Walensky.
they were echoed by entire phalanxes of talking heads in no uncertain terms.
this was not “open to interpretation.” this was one unified edifice of talking points flawless in its fealty to narrative and relentless in its application.
even “the big guy” got involved.
was not “open to interpretation.” this was one unified edifice of talking points flawless in its fealty to narrative and relentless in its application.
even “the big guy” got involved.
but it all traces back to tony.
these were his words that the rest of this ecosystem regurgitated as the deadly, untested trump toxins became the safe and vital fauci ouchies that only a conspiracist or a science denier could doubt.
and they were clearly, plainly wrong.
and tony is clearly and plainly lying now about what he said then.
the whole unified front of the medicine of make believe is clearly and plainly lying now about what they said then.
they played politics with your health, pure and simple. and they are trying to do it again as they claim that the literal foundational plank of their covid policy was “some sort of misunderstanding.”
. . . .
i mean, these people literally sold us vaccines as the only off ramp to restrictions. that lasted what, about 3 weeks before it started to unravel in the face of infections?
the WHO literally bet the ranch on this, remember?
certain waggish internet felines went so far as to make memes about it.
the CDC literally went so far as to change the definition of vaccines (and their purpose) once it became clear what was going on.
and again, we have the receipts.
this is not miscommunication, it’s misinformation, and it’s being spread purposefully and with malice aforethought.
they told us two shots would work, then it was 3, fauci is already babbling about 4 before boosters in the US have even hit 25%.
they told us it would work on variants, instead, leaky vaccines did what leaky vaccines do and selected near instantly for OAS and vaxx evasion.
and while tony and the totalitarians are trying to sell you another album of discordant dissembling, some others are waking up.
almost no one went in earlier and harder on vaxx passes and vaxx mandates than israel. they went in fast and furious for boosters too, even mandating them for going out in public
pathwhisperer@pathwhisperer.info
(please resend any unanswered emails)
All material copyrighted 2024.
Nonprofit internet use allowed with proper credit.
For nonprofit published or for profit use please contact me.
"Path Whisperer" and "pathwhisperer" trademarked.
This blog advances opinions, not statements of scientific certainties. All outside commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments. If included in the blog they are presented as the commenters' own opinions only.
The Path Whisperer 