First. It is now possible to objectively/scientifically recognize psychopaths. Second, their unhappy response to this. I.E., the attempted enslavement of the rest of us — see the two prior posts.
Hearsay can’t be considered evidence. But individuals are certainly free to decide if they believe a particular hearsay account to be more likely true or more likely false. This story is at one level of hearsay (to me, and two levels to you), there is an individual who alleges to have been an eye/ear witness to alleged bragging by Andrew Cuomo, then there is the individual who relayed the story to me. I trust my source did not make up this account, and I believe my source believes his source — the foregoing doesn’t necessarily mean anything but I want to add it to the mix.
If I could suggest how others approach the following, I’d suggest the these questions. Does this account square with what you know of Mr. Cuomo, either personally or from the public record? Could you see him planning and doing the following? Is he Machiavellian enough? If so, could you see him wishing to brag about it? Is he arrogant enough to commit to such a strategy? Etc.
This account, involving his divorce, goes as follows. Nobody, of course, wants a divorce to publicly devolve into a blackmail contest of mutual dirt slinging and airing of dirty laundry. Particularly not a politician.
Allegedly, Andrew Cuomo and his wife agreed to a trial separation, with a stated (not in writing) agreement that sex with others was acceptable. A setup for a trap? Mr. Cuomo allegedly then hired a private detective to follow his soon to be ex-wife. At an appropriate time to catch his wife in flagrante delicto, alledgedly the private detective and Mr. Cuomo burst into the hotel room (or whereever), cameras in hand and flashes a-poppin’. Voila, a nice quiet divorce.
What’s your opinion, could you see Andrew doing such? Is he the type of personality that would want to brag about it?
Would you want him to wield facial recognition/AI tracking powers? https://www.vocativ.com/396745/memo-new-york-called-for-face-recognition-cameras-at-bridges-tunnels/index.html, https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-07-21/big-brother-surveillance-begins-cuomo-unveils-facial-scanning-new-york-toll-plazas.
After the last election, I recall Mr. Cuomo being asked what he thought of Ms. Teachout. Paraphrased from memory, ‘Ahh, political season. Gotta love it. Opinions, everyone has one’ and then laughed. Let me translate that from psychopath-speak. He was calling her an asshole. The complete phrase, of course, is ‘opionions are like assholes, everyone has one.’ I’m sure all the other psychopaths laughed too.
Then there is his latest “America was never great” flap. Psychopaths in the thrall of groupthink are dangerous, they easily lose the thread. He and his advisors no doubt thought they were destroying Trumps’ trump card, his ‘Make America Great Again‘ campaign.
Finally, on Andrew, have you noticed his voice? Its very ugly. I believe he lacks the empathic soul that animates a normal human voice.
Moving on, how about Chris?
Fox News host Tucker Carlson poked fun at CNN’s Chris Cuomo Friday, playing a bizarre video Cuomo posted on Instagram. . . .
In Cuomo’s video, he makes a few vague comments about last summer’s “Wonder Woman” movie before making air kisses.
Cuomo says, “‘Wonder Woman,’ amazing. We finally had a female director of break the $100 million mark. The film means more than just its box score. What does it mean to you? Here’s a little intrigue–I wanted to be like Wonder Woman, and I’m gonna wear a shirt that says it.”
“What does it qualify as intrigue that Chris Cuomo wanted to be Wonder Woman? Did he ever wear that shirt? What’s with the air kisses? There are so many more questions,” Carlson said.
He sarcastically continued, “It’s better to understand Chris Cuomo for who he is. An artist, poet, seeker, shaman. The question is not, what the hell is Chris talking about, but what is Chris Cuomo trying to teach us, all of us, humanity itself?” http://dailycaller.com/2017/10/14/tucker-plays-bizarre-clip-of-cnns-chris-cuomo-talking-total-nonsense-video/
At what age does an child’s gender identity solidify? It would seem that significant parts of Chris’s personality are arrested prior to that point.
More, CNN’s Chris Cuomo Excuses Antifa’s Violence Because ‘All Punches Are Not Equal . . .’ — Chris Cuomo: We At CNN Can Possess WikiLeaks Emails, But You Can’t. — CNN’s Chris Cuomo: ‘Fake news’ insult ‘equivalent of the N-word. Uh, . . ., guys, gals, . . .
Finally, if someone would give me a toothbrush from each of Mario, Andrew and Chris plus 15 thousand dollars, I’ll give you the Cuomo bloodline, the Cuomo psychopathic bloodline.
Regarding Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook, would you say his looks are odd? His eyes strange? Would you say, or understand why someone else might describe his eyes as flat or shallow? Would you say, or understand why someone else might say there was no soul behind his eyes? Would you say, or understand why someone else might say the phrase, ‘the lights are on, but nobody is home”? Does he seem arrogant to you? Almost emotionless? Personality-less?
Any ‘yes’, means you are on the way. That’s how recognizing psychopaths start.
“Dumb F–ks”: Julian Assange Reminds Us What Mark Zuckerberg Thinks Of Facebook Users
“Julian Assange fired off a tweet Friday afternoon reminding people of the time Mark Zuckerberg called his users “Dumb fucks” because they trusted him with their private information.
Zuck: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard
Zuck: Just ask.
Zuck: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS
[Redacted Friend’s Name]: What? How’d you manage that one?
Zuck: People just submitted it.
Zuck: I don’t know why.
Zuck: They “trust me”
Zuck: Dumb fucks.
I have deleted my Facebook.
In fact, I never had one. Friends don’t put their friends into a giant intelligence database controlled by a megalomaniac who calls his users “dumb fucks” for trusting him. pic.twitter.com/4KaUwRSLMm
— Julian Assange ⌛ (@JulianAssange) March 23, 2018 “ https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03-25/dumb-f-ks-julian-assange-reminds-us-what-mark-zuckerberg-thinks-facebook-users
Wake up, Eloi.
Is Mark Zuckerberg’s wardrobe that of a genius… or psychopath?
Please note, Facebook has just shut down Alex Jones Infowars’ sites and Venezuelan sites. It doesn’t matter what you think of these sites, next time it could be you. The war begins.
Nobody likes being slimed by a psychopath.
“‘I was shocked it was so easy’: meet the professor who says facial recognition can tell if you’re gay”.
This individual who doesn’t believe in guilt or free will should turn his AI photo machine loose on faces like his own.
‘It’s not the sex of the individual, it’s the person’ (paraphrased). That’s deep, man, deep. Yeah, love the one your with! Plus, all cats are gray in the dark!
I’ve decided to take pics of annoying neighborhood psychopaths (or probable psychopaths). The criteria could be almost anything. 1) I might find them annoying for no known reason, that’s good enough for me. If my emotional reaction says they are annoying, I assume the cause just hasn’t reached my consciousness yet. (I’m with those who say every psychological growth stage is still within our psyche and can be drawn on. I urge everone to reintegrate with their 5/6 year old self who knew whom they liked or trusted). 2) It might seem to me that I run into them too often. 3) It might seem that they keep showing up in too timely a manner as though checking up on my health after attacks.
The store he is sitting in front of has been the site of a number of anomalous occurrences (were they more than that?, you tell me). I hesitate to discuss such matters, it seems to lose me visitors and commenters. Oh, well.
I used to go to this store almost everyday for a coffee and a pastry. One day there’s an individual, whom I had never seen before, in front of me at the self serve coffee machine. Nothing unusual, except I really disliked him, for no known reason. And then, he left the milk out for me — ah, a nice guy. Then I see there’s only enough milk left in the carton for one cup of coffee. That’s odd. Then I see there’s another open milk container in the refridgerator section. That’s very odd. I’d never, ever seen two open cartons in this very small store at the same time. Who wants a stinking coffee anyway? Two anomalies are enough for me to alter my path. There was also at least one more anomalous event concerning a cup of coffee there.
I also used to buy a particular chocolate bar almost everyday. One day I went in and there were 7 – 8 individuals crowded around the cashier at the candy counter. I had to sort of push through just barely able to reach the bars. However somebody had conveniently left a bar sitting flat on top of all the others making it easier to grab, what a nice person. So I grabbed it and left a dollar on the counter. Then as I left with chocolate, I suddenly realized that all the people around the counter knew each other and were sort of moving in coordination (obviously I trust messages from my subconscious). Plus the responses of the few that I had to squeeze by with ‘excuse me, excuse me,” seemed wrong to me. One of the things that is impossible in this world is pretending not to know someone (it doesn’t matter if they pretend to ignore you or if they engage with you). They recognized me. Who wants a stinking chocolate?
The individual in the pic didn’t play a part in any of the above occurrences. But he did play a peripheral part in another anomalous event. I have to qualify this story as being from the ‘I’d never believe it, if it hadn’t happened to me’ file drawer. There was another store where I would often buy a particular item. One day as I approach the door I see the same neighborhood psychopath (or likely psychopath) chatting with a plain clothes policeman sitting on a milk crate pretending to be a homeless panhandler (recognizing undercover cops). OK. Then immediately inside the door there is a fake mentally ill homeless person wearing five or six shirts. OK How do I know he was fake, his ‘intent’ was all wrong. Then I noticed that he actually wasn’t doing anything, just standing there. So I went over to the proper shelf, and there was only one sample of the item available. OK. Then, in the line, the guy behind me struck up a small conversation — but he didn’t look at me as though I were a stranger. OK. Then as I walked from the front of the line to the cash register clerk, he suddenly said , ‘oops, he had forgotten his money and would have to come back’ and left the line. OK. However both he and the five shirt fake mentally ill person seemed to suddently relax and almost smile at my making the purchase. Hmm. Then as I left the store I stepped around the corner of the building to make a cell phone call. Then the fake homeless cop almost knocked me down tearing around the corner carrying his milk crate as though his shift was over. Hmmm. That’s too many anomalies for me, who wants this stinking item?
Some might say all the above have credible reasons for happening as they happened and that I’m imagining things. OK, maybe, but I don’t think so. I say that the reason that I’m alive and Kathy Krajco, Linda Mealey and others are dead is that I read intent and they didn’t.
Another day I’m sitting in a local coffee shop. I notice a psychopath I’d never seen in the neighborhood before in the ordering line. However, he displayed no intent of actually desiring a coffee or a bagel, displayed no ‘yum, yum, yummy, I can’t wait for my bagel’ anticipation. Further I suddenly realized (there I go again) that his intent was hostile and that I was his target. He left before me. As I left some 5, 10 minutes later, I see him walking at an ange to intercept me. So I walk along and suddenly stop when we are about two feet apart and we stand there staring at each other. That’s close enough so there are no secrets and it was obvious that this psychopath knew and hated me. But I actually didn’t sense any intent of immediate harm. I’ve noticed before that sometimes psychopaths like to ‘mark’ their targets. The actual attack took place later that day. In NYC there are often one/two story scaffolds up around buildings for building inspections. The way they are built funnel pedestrians into two lanes and if there is a sidewalk cafe into one lane. You could call it a double pinch point. So I’m walking through such a double pinch point (across the street from the first cafe) and suddenly someone rushing by me brushes me physically in his hurry. I’m thinking,’whoa, I guess he was in a hurry.’ Then, ‘wait a minute, that was with purposeful intent, he brushed against me purposely, what’s going on here?’ So I spun around and there’s a woman around six inches behind me, holding her purse up to her chest with one hand, while removing something from it with the other, while staring intently at what had been the back of my head. She must have moved in close in coordination with the brush by, I was supposed to notice only the brush by. Unfortunately I didn’t have the presence of mind to tackle her and empty her purse. She snatched her hand out of her purse and just hurried away. A fentanyl swab behind the ears (http://time.com/khaled-mashaal/)? A psychotic anxiety level causing agent (i.e. to cause suicide)? A prussic acid aerosol to cause a heart attack (or something more up to date)? Who knows?
Anyway, the idividual pictured at the top has lately been looking at me like the cat that ate the canary, so I decided to write this down.
Recently a local proprietor, that I had known for almost twenty years, said they were collecting customers’ pics and that I was to be the first. Within a few seconds I had ten/twenty shots taken with a camera with biometric capabilities. I had crossed paths with specific psychopathic undercover cops on my previous visit. Should I be worried? Cut my hair shorter and shaved off my full beard just in case.
Wanderer gene — X-linked androgen receptor (AR) gene, short GGC repeat polymorphism
“a variant X-linked androgen receptor (AR) gene, predisposing the father to behaviors that include family abandonment, may be passed to their daughters causing early puberty, precocious sexuality, and behavior problems. The results of a study of 121 White males and 164 White females showed a significant association of the short alleles of the GGC repeat polymorphism of the AR gene with a range of measures of aggression and impulsivity, increased number of sexual partners, sexual compulsivity, and lifetime number of sex partners in males; and paternal divorce, father absence, and early age of menarche in females.” http://www.hopepress.com/html/abstract_91-100.html
X-linked means that this psychopathic candidate gene affects both males and females (female chromosomes of course are XX, males, XY), and androgen receptors ‘dock’ to male hormones such as testosterone, which is what we want, again for both females and males. Linda Mealey posited that psychopathy was sex-limited, i.e. required an androgen environment to ‘flower’.
[S]ociopaths are individuals on the extreme end of a normal distribution whose genetic component is (1) polygenic and (2) to a large degree, sexlimited. [Sex- limited genes, not to be confused with sex-linked genes, are those which are located on the autosomes of both sexes but which are triggered into expression only within the chemical/ hormonal microenvironment of one sex or the other. Common examples include beard and mustache growth in men, and breast and hip development in women.] If a large number of the many genes underlying sociopathy are triggered by testosterone or some other androgen, many more men than women will pass the threshold of the required number of active genes necessary for its outward expression. According to the two-threshold model, those females who do express the trait must have a greater overall “dose” or “genetic load” . . . https://pathwhisperer.info/2011/08/07/the-sociobiology-of-sociopathy-an-integrated-evolutionary-model-linda-mealey/
Ruthlessness gene — arginine vasopressin receptor 1A ” AVPR1a”, allele 334 or short RS3 repeats
Ebstein and his colleagues decided to look at AVPR1a because it is known to produce receptors in the brain that detect vasopressin, a hormone involved in altruism and ‘prosocial’ behaviour. Studies of prairie voles have previously shown that this hormone is important for binding together these rodents’ tight-knit social groups.
Ebstein’s team wondered whether differences in how this receptor is expressed in the human brain may make different people more or less likely to behave generously.
To find out, they tested DNA samples from more than 200 student volunteers, before asking the students to play the dictator game (volunteers were not told the name of the game, lest it influence their behaviour). Students were divided into two groups: ‘dictators’ and ‘receivers’ (called ‘A’ and ‘B’ to the participants). Each dictator was told that they would receive 50 shekels (worth about US$14), but were free to share as much or as little of this with a receiver, whom they would never have to meet. The receiver’s fortunes thus depended entirely on the dictator’s generosity.
About 18% of all dictators kept all of the money, Ebstein and his colleagues report in the journal Genes, Brain and Behavior1. About one-third split the money down the middle, and a generous 6% gave the whole lot away.
Long and short
There was no connection between the participants’ gender and their behaviour, the team reports. But there was a link to the length of the AVPR1a gene: people were more likely to behave selfishly the shorter their version of this gene.
It isn’t clear how the length of AVPR1a affects vasopressin receptors: it is thought that rather than controlling the number of receptors, it may control where in the brain the receptors are distributed. Ebstein suggests the vasopressin receptors in the brains of people with short AVPR1a may be distributed in such a way to make them less likely to feel rewarded by the act of giving.
Though the mechanism is unclear, Ebstein says, he is fairly sure that selfish, greedy dictatorship has a genetic component. It would be easier to confirm this if history’s infamous dictators conveniently had living identical twins, he says, so we could see if they were just as ruthless as each other. https://www.nature.com/news/2008/080404/full/news.2008.738.html
Genetic cocktail — psychopathy genetic markers
DRD2 A1, DRD4 7-repeat, 5HTTLPR/rs25531, COMPT (or COMT) Met108/158, MAOA-L (corrections welcome).
So, . . .which one, if any of these, is the no fellow-human-feeling, no empathy, no guilt gene, . . .where do full-genetic-dose psychopaths such as Stacey Castor or Michael Swango fall on this (actually they are not full spectrum full dose psychopaths — they did have the capacity to exercise restraint and to strategize, but on the other-humans-are-just-bugs continuum they are full dose)?