You can just hear that scream, that confusion, that shock.
A plea sent out over the ether.
You can just hear that scream, that confusion, that shock.
A plea sent out over the ether.
You got it.
I’m half joking, it’s almost impossible to know the exact percentages. Personally, I believe, for the NYPD, it’s very high — judging from the sheer number of undercover officers that I recognize that I also recognize as psychopaths. Also being an undercover officer would be very attractive to psychopaths.
Recognizing undercover police officers is on a need-to-know basis. If you need to know, you will gain the ability to recognize them. Basically, cops pay attention differently than others, also their intent is always different. For example a crazy person standing and staring into the sky has one intent, a cop standing and staring into the sky in exactly the same position has another, namely the intent to look like a crazy person.
These cues are very subtle, too subtle for someone without the need to know to pick up. One can’t be trained to do so, but one can learn to.
The subconscious mind is much more powerful than the conscious mind. As a trained actor I believe and know that. I’m not making this up. Scientists Prove that Your Brain is Actually Smarter Than You Are. (Before someone says, ‘Oh, but you’re always attacking those who live in ‘expert mediated realities’, and now you’re quoting them.’ So what. And I’d do it again.)
No psychopath should ever be allowed to join any police force. I once contacted the NYPD Inspector General Philip Eure volunteering to handle this situation, but he never got back to me. Oh well.
I would like to urge strongly, very strongly, that NYPD Deputy Commissioner for Intelligence & Counterterrorism, John J. Miller, be asked to prove he is not a psychopath. This can be done through brains scans, both structural and functional, plus a DNA test could be informative.
To honest and moral law enforcement, do you really think French police chief Helric Fredou of the Hebdo case committed suicide?
I was going to name an earlier iteration of this post: Psychopaths pass among us unnoticed . . ..
The individual on the left is the porcelain doll — brittle, fragile, rigid, perfect. The other two are his enablers. It’s amazing how many people find me by the search “are narcissists attracted to psychopaths.”
Back to the current post, please note that the Chelsea bombing took place immediately after Bratton’s exit. The older I get the less I like coincidences. Recall the murders of police officers during ongoing or right before anti-police violence demonstrations, essentially defanging the demonstrations. This is exactly the kind of thing a psychopath in a position of power might do (and then go to bed laughing about). Recall also, a photographer lining up a number of cops for a pic exactly at the same time an insane individual with a hatchet was there to attack from the back. Something smells.
Hint, they won’t accept the challenge.
Mika Brzezinsky calling Donald Trump mentally ill: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/trump-mental-health-mika-brzezinski-227492.
David Plouffe on Trump: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/david-plouffe-trump-psychopath_us_57c30ba9e4b04193420f9a29.
The dead child/dust bunny test. Non-psychopaths’ brains would respond differently to the following two images. No differentiation would indicate the lack of even a biological possibility of empathy, namely psychopathy (https://pathwhisperer.info/2015/09/18/test-all-presidential-candidates/).
Anyone ever see one of the Morning Joe shows where he’s totally out of control? Notice anything worth sharing? Anyone see (better yet know where to find) the clip of the Joe and Dylan Ratigan greeting? Not merely hugging, they are practically climbing over each other. Arrested development much? The last time you and I did that we were probably 5 or 6. Then, of course, there’s always the never cleared up Lori Klausutis story (https://duckduckgo.com/?q=scarborogh+klausutis+&t=h_&ia=web).
Obvious at a glance. For examples of his arrogance, thinking patterns and behavior, please see the following. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-04-17/hillary-clinton-grooming-former-goldman-banker-become-americas-next-treasury-secreta. More from Zerohedge: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=site%3Azerohedge.com+gensler&t=h_&ia=web. From Max Keiser: http://www.maxkeiser.com/tag/gary-gensler/.
Our false economy is essentially a psychopaths-gone-wild economy. Psychopathic banker parasites are killing the host economy. In nature, parasites learn (evolve, actually) to not kill the host. Psychopaths can’t learn (refuse, actually, so enamored with their own superiority). (If interested further, https://pathwhisperer.info/2012/01/04/psychopaths-caused-the-financial-crisis-and-they-will-do-it-again-and-again-unless-they-are-removed-from-power/, https://pathwhisperer.info/2008/09/24/commonalities-between-wall-street-speculators-andor-fed-bankers-and-sociopaths/, https://pathwhisperer.info/2008/10/11/welcome-to-our-sociopaths-gone-wild-economy/.)
The following is a quote from the Neglected Books (http://neglectedbooks.com/?p=241) regarding The Incredible Charlie Carewe:
“[. . . . ] A year later, Doubleday released her first novel, The Incredible Charlie Carewe.
Although it suffers some of the typical construction problems of a first novel, The Incredible Charlie Carewe is a remarkable work that demonstrates “qualities of depth and reality” equal to those Anderson noted in Astor’s acting. Charlie Carewe is the handsome, charming, charismatic son of a wealthy East Coast Establishment family with impeccable bloodlines. On the surface, it seems as if the sky is the limit–no doors are closed to Charlie Carewe.
Unfortunately, something is a bit, well, odd, about Charlie. At first, there is just a sense that his behavior is a bit hard to explain, but given his class and status, his parents, his sister, the help–everyone writes it off to quirks in his character. But then his sister comes across Charlie in the rocks along the shore of their country estate–bashing a playmate’s head into the rocks:
There was absolutely no savagery in the action, no passion or hatred, no viciousness, He looked up briefly as he saw Virginia and Jeff and called out a smiling “Hi!” and then went back to his task. Firmly, purposefully, as though he were occupied in cracking a coconut. In the seconds before movement came back to the paralyzed observers another wave whispered up to the two boys and receded with pink in its foam.
Charlie’s victim is rushed off to the hospital with permanent brain damage and the Carewe’s social finesse is put to the test as they graciously usher out their guests as if nothing more than an unfortunate accident had taken place. The next morning, as he tucks into his breakfast, he asks chattily, “What’s the news on Roger? Did he die?”
The Carewes can recognize that they have something of a ticking time bomb on their hands, but their upbringing and lack of psychological awareness (the incident above takes place in the early 1920s) leaves them helpless when it comes to dealing with it. They shuttle Charlie through a series of elite prep schools, smoothing over matters when he’s quietly asked to leave due to thefts, attacks on other students, or other indiscretions. For a long time, the only person who seems remotely able to accept that Charlie’s actions are more than a little abnormal is his sister Virginia, and even she is at a loss to explain it:
As usual, she thought, she was making a fuss, putting too much importance on Charlie’s behavior. She should be used to it now. Wearily she thought, at least there was one consistency; in any given situation, Charlie could be counted on to do the wrong thing, the inappropriate thing. Nobody, but nobody, could be more charming when he wanted to be. He had, it seemed, a full command of the social graces, and in any gathering, especially of people who were strangers to him, could attract attention with no effort. People would gravitate toward him, toward the sound of his pleasant voice, his contagious laugh; but always he seemed to want to destroy it….
Schools could expel him, friends were quickly made and quickly lost, his contact with any kind of social life was brief, and none of it seemed to matter to him. Nor did it matter that the cumulative effect was destroying a family.
Astor displays a clinical objectivity in leading us through every step along the way as Charlie spreads havoc into the lives of almost everyone he meets. In each situation, the pattern is the same: glittering, showy success followed by abrupt failure due to some or other act of willful brutality. His forms a company, makes a great splash, achieves fame as a tycoon and philanthropist, and within a couple of years is being escorted out by his nearly bankrupted partners. He makes a show of joining the Navy after Pearl Harbor, then weasels his way out by pretending to be a bed-wetter. He drives his wife to divorce and alcoholism, borrows and loses money from friends, seduces wives and ruins friendships.
Not even the incredibly strong defenses of family fortune and status, though, can withstand the destructive force of Charlie’s will, however, and only an unlucky trip on a staircase keeps Charlie from standing alone in a wasteland of his own fallout. What Charlie is, we can now see in a glance with the benefit of much greater awareness, is, of course, a psychopath. The psychiatrist Hervey Cleckley recognized this, citing Astor’s book in the 1964 edition of his classic work on psychopathology, The Mask of Sanity:
In many respects the most realistic and successful of all portrayals of the psychopath is that presented by Mary Astor in The Incredible Charlie Carewe. The rendition is so effective that even those unfamiliar with the psychopath in actual experience are likely to sense the reality of what is disclosed. The subject is superbly dealt with, and the book constitutes a faithful and arresting study of a puzzling and infinitely complex subject. Charlie Carewe emerges as an exquisite example of the psychopath – the best, I believe, to be found in any work of fiction.
The Incredible Charlie Carewe should be read not only by every psychiatrist but also by every physician. It will hold the attention of all intelligent readers, and I believe it will be of great value in helping the families of psychopaths to gain insight into the nature of the tragic problem with which they are dealing, usually in blindness and confusion.
By this point, anyone reading this review who’s been in a bookstore in the last decade can’t help but think of Bret Easton Ellis’ American Psycho. If asked to sum up the book in a single catchphrase, I would have to say, “Imagine American Psycho written by Louis Auchincloss (or Edith Wharton).” Where Ellis writes to shock, Astor writes to show how people of refinement and elaborate rules of conduct respond when faced with pure irrational violence.
The Incredible Charlie Carewe is a remarkable novel not just in the detail and accuracy of its portrayal of a psychopath but in the “depth and reality” of its portrayal of the society in which this particular psychopath operates. Astor is very much in the territory of Wharton and Auchincloss, and she’s clearly deeply familiar with it. This is a novel that has more than a few parallels with the story of the 20th century as a whole, which is one reason it’s a genuine shame that it vanished after a single Dell paperback release in 1963.”
Other mentions of Astor’s Charlie Carewe: https://pathwhisperer.info/?s=carewe&submit=Search
From the ‘[S]nake-hearted’ era . . . post:
Sadly this was written in the 1950s. I’m sure the authors, William March (the novel) and Maxwell Anderson (the play), thought knowledge of psychopathy would spread quickly in the modern age. As did Hervey Cleckley, Mask of Sanity, and Mary Astor, The Incredible Charlie Carewe, (https://kat.cr/the-incredible-charlie-carewe-mary-astor-mobi-t7972573.html, https://openlibrary.org/books/OL5798604M/The_incredible_Charlie_Carewe), no doubt. I don’t know what went wrong. (https://pathwhisperer.info/2014/11/08/this-snake-hearted-era-reginald-taskers-monologue-from-the-bad-seed/)
Why knowledge of psychopathy has not spread throughout society is worthy of an extended discussion.
From Lovefraud, O.N. Ward:
“Chapter 3: Sociopath Math
I can almost hear the collective cacophony. “Onna! That can’t be the whole story. There has to be something more to it. There are always two sides.”
In an attempt to be fair and to give everyone involved the benefit of the doubt, we tend to discount and dismiss malicious, destructive behavior. Sociopaths count on this. Contrary to the popular saying, there are not always two valid sides to any story (and it would not surprise me if it was a sociopath who first planted this idea in our collective unconscious). Are there two sides to the story of Bernie Madoff’s multi-billion dollar Ponzi scheme? Does the heart-breaking story of Laci Peterson and her unborn son’s 2002 Christmas-time murder at the hands of her philandering husband Scott have two sides? What about the conviction of ex-policeman Drew Peterson for murdering his third wife—are there two sides to that story? (His fourth wife has been missing since 2007.) It is critical to realize that there does not have to be more to the story of Paul and Jenny—not if Paul is a sociopath.
Since we have empathy and a conscience, it is almost impossible for us to imagine that there are people, like Paul, who are devoid of both. Yet, there are—lots of them. To help silence those voices in your head that want to give Paul a legitimate side to the story, I would like to give you a crash course in what I call sociopath math.” http://www.lovefraud.com/2016/04/28/sociopaths-count-on-you-getting-the-benefit-of-the-doubt/
Available from Amazon: “Husband, Liar, Sociopath: How He Lied, Why I Fell For It & The Painful Lessons Learned”
A phrase I’ve heard directly from psychopaths (I use the words synonymously): ‘Go ahead and tell, no one will believe you anyway’. That’s often true. It’s called assumed similarity bias/assumed normalcy bias (https://pathwhisperer.info/2015/11/02/assumed-similarity-bias/).
Well, . . . it ain’t easy. It depends mostly on whether the company has a hr department run by actual sociopaths/psychopaths. Sociopaths/psychopaths love being in hr, they get to play puppet master. If that’s not the case there’s still the question of how to overcome the hr reps’ assumed-similarity/assumed-normalcy bias — facts can overcome a bias or syndrome but will just bounce off an assumed-similarity psychotic (one should keep in mind that that assumed-similarity comes in all flavors: bias, syndrome, disorder, psychosis — incidentally the same is true for naive prey response syndrome). See https://pathwhisperer.info/2015/11/02/assumed-similarity-bias/, https://pathwhisperer.info/2011/02/11/a-search-today-i-am-the-target-of-a-sociopathic-bully-what-do-i-do/.
My experience with psychopathic harassment was while working for UBS, which I consider to have a psychopathic history (as essentially Nazi bankers during WWII and the later holocaust gold scandal), psychopaths in management, psychopaths in human resources. Actually I consider UBS to be psychopathic entity. I should have left early on.