I wouldn’t have voted for Roy Moore, we are too far apart on the issues. But that’s what should determine elections – issues and vision of the future, not character assassination. We all deserve fair play whether in the political arena, courts or life. Without judging the allegations (though I’ve never, ever, witnessed a tearless fake crier who I ended up believing. Tearless fake crying is a psychopathic pity play specialty, they think we are too stupid to notice), I’d like to focus on the psychopathic gang stalking strategies used against him. Even if it turns out he is guilty of the allegations, which we have no proof of and mostly aren’t as serious as the inflated terms used, the media approach was very improper.
The attack was essentially through a very sly and improper use of English plus a kind of word inflation. “Accused pedophile”, “accused molester” were terms that were used across the media (in seemingly organized fashion, but then our fake news industry is really a social engineering industry). There is no such thing as either of those terms. ‘Accused pedophile?’ — ‘what’s the pedophile accused of?’ — the phrase assumes the actuality of the subject of the sentence being a pedophile. This is a purposeful psychopath-think strategy to ‘slide’ the pedophile accusation into the realm of reality. The proper term of course is ‘alleged pedophile.’ However in this instance Roy Moore was never accused of pedophilia. He was accused of sexual activity with a post puberty minor by a then 14 year old. Pedophilia is the sexual interest in pre-pubescent children. He was never accused of that. If the then fourteen year old’s assertions are true, the crime would have been lewd behavior with a minor — not child molestation or statutory rape (which is consenting sex with a minor before the age of consent). But the terms, pedophile, child abuser, molester, perv have been thrown around by the so-called journalists. Katy Tur and that fake journalist with his own fake news show, Chris Cuomo, come to mind. Roy Moore should collect instances where the term alleged was not added and sue. I don’t know if he’s guilty of any of these allegations but I do know the media is guilty of psychopathic gangstalking through the purposeful sly use of language and word meaning inflation plus general moral sliminess in the cause of character assassination.
There were many elements involved in the character attack on Moore. They obviously hoped to stampede him out of the race. It started with a piling on of allegations (none of which had ever surfaced before in his controversial and contentious political/judicial career — this doesn’t prove them false, but does raise questions) with no time for a where-does-the-truth-lay investigation. There is no such thing as ‘Oh, the accuser is credible, so we should just believe the accuser.’ We’re not mind readers and no court works like that. In a ‘he said, she said’ law case, both stories are examined and both parties cross examined. If an accuser is credible then you take the accusers accusations seriously and examine them, not take them on faith. That public assertion by so much of the media otherwise is simple nonsense and a symptom of their moral corruption. Then of course, there was the frequently raised question of “what motivation would the accusers have had to lie” and thus that they must be telling the truth. That’s naive and childish at best, and assumed similarity disorder at worst. There are as many motivations to lie as there are types of mental illness (each with its own peculiar motivations), as there are individuals desirous of more money, as there are individuals who can be blackmailed, etc.
Going back to tearless fake criers, we all recall Juanita Broaddrick. A number of years ago I was going to do a post analyzing a couple of her accusatory (against Bill Clinton) videos but never got around to it. There were moments where in the midst of her fake crying and shoulder shaking she would get still and look out through her outstretched fingers that were ‘hiding her grief’ and seemingly judge, with cold tearless eyes, the effect of her performance. I found her totally unbelievable and strongly suspect (extremely strongly suspect) her of being an actual psychopath and probably that rarest of rare, a pseudologue.
I haven’t analyzed the video of Berverly Nelson’s claims in detail, but my instinctive reaction to the parts shown on the news was that this woman was lying, not merely faking the crying. There should be no public prohibition on asking and examining whether accusers are psychopaths or other pathological liars.
Finally, honest journalism would have reported both sides’ claims and responses and leave the opinion making to the viewers/readers. But obviously todays ‘journalists’ see their job as being opinion drivers and will use dishonest psychopathic strategies to do so. That’s evil.
A relative of mine received a call last week. The caller asked for my relative by name, when the answer was in the affirmative, the caller replied “murder, murder, murder”. ‘I’se paid my money, and I’se taken my chances.’ They haven’t. They didn’t sign up for this. Therefore I am going public.
There have always be reasons to do so and reasons not to do so. a) One always wishes for a higher level of proof, not just to make bald assertions. b) I have enough problem with readers’ Assumed Normalcy Bias on the main subject, let alone on high tech assassination attempts. c) My comment numbers have never recovered from my first account of a remotely induced arrhythmia attack (presumably through microwave technology) in It seems I’m being harassed — though, in fact, I had left out the punch line that it had been an assassination attempt. So until now, I have chosen not to take this matter public. However I can’t allow my relatives to be threatened. Plus I have always owed it to others in danger, to warn them so they can recognize situations and take proper precautions. Plus, recently the threats to myself have perhaps become physical again. So here it is.
To those suffering from Assumed Normalcy Bias/Disorder/Psychosis and believe they can always pound triangular pegs into square holes in support of the world as they think they know it — this is not for you. I have no desire to engage you. This is a warning to those who need to be made aware of danger.
I am claiming that the arrhythmias shown above were induced remotely. What else could I conclude, if the arrhythmias came and went with physical obstacles? The time I started to realize this was during the 2011 attack above (which only covered two days and rarely repeated until this series). On Seventh Ave. and 49th, there’s a subway entrance at a corner of a building. At the very corner is a massive support column for the whole building. Feeling poorly, I stepped out of the foot traffic to rest leaning against the interior of this column. Immediately my heart started collecting itself, coming back into rhythm. I was flabbergasted. In the current series, one time I was walking on Broadway heading uptown, and suddenly my bare arms became physically warm (this only happened that one time) and Ali and Foreman started going at it in my chest. As luck would have it, I was half a block from a scaffolded building. So within 10 seconds I was starting to respond positively. A block further, we were sitting in a restaurant. Within 5 minutes I was totally fine. I have many stories like this.
It seems that assassinations have gone medical and thus almost invisible. The techniques seem to work over distances, through some materials, including windows.
These attacks commenced shortly after publishing and sending to the administration and de Blasio attorneys the post, Psychopaths gone wild jurisprudence, the psychopathic weaponization of the legal system and misuse of the law for political hits, psychopaths walking among us include . . ., in June of 2016. The possible ‘psychopaths walking among us include[d]’: Eric Holder, William Canary, and later, John J. Miller and Rikki Klieman (Clear and present danger).
I do have defenses and work arounds, so I no longer have the extreme arrhythmias of the top left two examples. I don’t wish to state what they are, in case they have work arounds for my work arounds. But it is not rocket science, research what interacts with microwaves and try all-the-above. If the cause is not actually microwave in origin, the defenses would still interact with many other electro-magnetic waves also.
Let me add, at least this is a validation of my work.
Other attempts or anomalous occurrences
This anomalous, almost perfect crime vehicle showed up on the same day as two other serious anomalous occurrences. Note this vehicle had illegally dark windows, including the front window, the front license plate was kicked in at an acute angle making any license plate hard to read even without the illegally dark plastic plate cover this one had. The human eye could not read it, the digital camera pulled out the contrast however. The back license plate illegally had duct tape partially covering the numbers. I don’t have any hard evidence linking it to myself, however I change my route, plans, get out a camera, etc. simply on encountering anomalies.
From Lovefraud, O.N. Ward:
“Chapter 3: Sociopath Math
I can almost hear the collective cacophony. “Onna! That can’t be the whole story. There has to be something more to it. There are always two sides.”
In an attempt to be fair and to give everyone involved the benefit of the doubt, we tend to discount and dismiss malicious, destructive behavior. Sociopaths count on this. Contrary to the popular saying, there are not always two valid sides to any story (and it would not surprise me if it was a sociopath who first planted this idea in our collective unconscious). Are there two sides to the story of Bernie Madoff’s multi-billion dollar Ponzi scheme? Does the heart-breaking story of Laci Peterson and her unborn son’s 2002 Christmas-time murder at the hands of her philandering husband Scott have two sides? What about the conviction of ex-policeman Drew Peterson for murdering his third wife—are there two sides to that story? (His fourth wife has been missing since 2007.) It is critical to realize that there does not have to be more to the story of Paul and Jenny—not if Paul is a sociopath.
Since we have empathy and a conscience, it is almost impossible for us to imagine that there are people, like Paul, who are devoid of both. Yet, there are—lots of them. To help silence those voices in your head that want to give Paul a legitimate side to the story, I would like to give you a crash course in what I call sociopath math.” http://www.lovefraud.com/2016/04/28/sociopaths-count-on-you-getting-the-benefit-of-the-doubt/
Available from Amazon: “Husband, Liar, Sociopath: How He Lied, Why I Fell For It & The Painful Lessons Learned”
A phrase I’ve heard directly from psychopaths (I use the words synonymously): ‘Go ahead and tell, no one will believe you anyway’. That’s often true. It’s called assumed similarity bias/assumed normalcy bias (https://pathwhisperer.info/2015/11/02/assumed-similarity-bias/).
Well, . . . it ain’t easy. It depends mostly on whether the company has a hr department run by actual sociopaths/psychopaths. Sociopaths/psychopaths love being in hr, they get to play puppet master. If that’s not the case there’s still the question of how to overcome the hr reps’ assumed-similarity/assumed-normalcy bias — facts can overcome a bias or syndrome but will just bounce off an assumed-similarity psychotic (one should keep in mind that that assumed-similarity comes in all flavors: bias, syndrome, disorder, psychosis — incidentally the same is true for naive prey response syndrome). See https://pathwhisperer.info/2015/11/02/assumed-similarity-bias/, https://pathwhisperer.info/2011/02/11/a-search-today-i-am-the-target-of-a-sociopathic-bully-what-do-i-do/.
My experience with psychopathic harassment was while working for UBS, which I consider to have a psychopathic history (as essentially Nazi bankers during WWII and the later holocaust gold scandal), psychopaths in management, psychopaths in human resources. Actually I consider UBS to be psychopathic entity. I should have left early on.
Quote from Psychopaths and Love, excerpts and paragraphs [Blue bolding added] (http://psychopathsandlove.com/dangerous-mistake-about-the-psychopathic-mind/):
Do You Make This Simple (But Dangerous) Mistake About the Psychopathic Mind?
“Misinterpreting the behavior of a disordered character is the first step in the process of being victimized by them.” (Dr. George Simon)
. . . Assumed Similarity Bias — a mental shortcut that leads us to the unconscious assumption that others share the same or similar values, thoughts and beliefs. We automatically assume that others are just like we are, especially when it comes to the fundamental aspects of our characters that are so basic we never even give them a second thought — such as having a conscience. [PW: let me add additional descriptive terms: normalcy bias, belief in basic human goodness bias, see-no-evil bias, mom and dad would have told me bias, keep reality within my current frame of reference bias, pound that square peg into that round hole bias, there’s nothing scary here bias, Captain Kangaroo [Mr. Rogers, etc.] never talked about this bias, everything traces back to childhood bias, etc.]
In other words, you never for a moment stop to consider that some people in fact have a drastically different way of being, one that is so foreign to you that you can’t even begin to grasp it.
. . .
“He doesn’t depend on our love because he ‘fears emptiness’… he depends on it because our love enables him to exploit and manipulate us. He doesn’t search for people to ‘cling to,’ he searches for people to VICTIMIZE. Don’t forget, we are dealing with a predator. You are attributing your feelings and motivations to him, when in fact they are not like yours at all. The anger is simply from frustration when he doesn’t get his needs met…They do not share our need for ‘authentic purpose.’ That’s your need, not the need of the psychopath. They have their own purpose, which is vastly different from your purpose.”
. . .
The truth is very difficult to understand from our own frame of reference. It’s important to understand it, though, because it is their significant differences that cause the harm we experience.
. . .
When we experience someone engaging in bad behavior of one kind or another, we think of it in terms of why WE might act that way and how WE would feel afterward. When we do this, we come up with the idea that the behavior may stem from insecurity, past wounds, fear, or a lack of love; and we imagine they must feel shame and guilt after treating us so badly. Because of this, we are more apt to forgive, to let things slide, to stick it out and see if things will change with love and acceptance and time.
But when the same things happen again and again, it comes time to face an important truth:
The only intelligent way to make judgements about people is to base those judgements on their patterns of behavior, and not on what we think the reasons for their behavior might be.
. . .
Unfortunately, traditional psychology still hangs on to the outdated belief that everyone is struggling with insecurities and fears, and teaches that this struggle is what causes problem behavior. This puts us at a disadvantage and leaves us vulnerable to abuse and exploitation. And it seems to say that the field of psychology itself is operating under its own ‘assumed similarity’ bias!
. . .
It’s very difficult to understand how the psychopathic mind works because it is so totally different from what we know. I think it’s made even harder because we don’t want to believe it’s possible, and we don’t want to accept that the person we were with was not at all who or what we thought they were, and that nothing we believed about the relationship was true… and that it wasn’t even a relationship at all. . . . (http://psychopathsandlove.com/dangerous-mistake-about-the-psychopathic-mind/)