From comment to post:
“I suspect/believe that The New Yorker’s article on Stanley Kubrick, prior to his death, was a hit piece (https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1999/06/14/a-kubrick-odyssey).
As Malcolm X Jr. (Malcolm Shabazz) said before he was thrown off a roof, ‘first they character assassinate you, then they assassinate you.’ The New Yorker article was followed by the medical assassination of Mr. Kubrick by a heart attack (hard to prove, but I would bet vast sums). I strongly suspect the author of the article knew that was coming. Purpose: why would people feel inclined to turn over stones and leaves in the death of an unsavory weirdo? The character assassination protects the assassins.
Finally, I consider Stanley Kubrick to be one of quite a few psychopathy awareness martyrs. “Eyes Wide Shut”, it doesn’t get clearer than that.”
https: //pathwhisperer.info/2018/01/23/trust-me-im-a-doctor-this-is-a-medical-treatment-psychopath-larry-nassar-md-molests-young-female-gymnasts-for-20-plus-years/#comment-139406 (take space out)
The Path Whisperer 
Ahh, Kubrick. This opens a lot of rabbit holes. I would consider him a chronicler for the elite globalist psychopaths who rule the world. Other chroniclers include Ridley Scott, James Cameron, Villeneuve, the Wachowski Brothers (now “sisters”), etc.
They are all “ticket takers”- those who have accepted a deal with the Devil.
The question has always been, Was Kubrick one of the Devils, or exposing them?
Well, he ran in their circles. He took the ticket and got the paycheck and glory. And like many before him, when he crossed a line or no longer became useful, they tossed him.
I don’t think he was a good guy, but you get the impression he was young and ambitious and didn’t know what he was getting himself into. And then got paranoid and reclusive.
Remorse? Only to the extent he wasn’t a full blown psychopath like his employers.
LikeLike
Resurrected for https://www.winterwatch.net/2023/08/stanley-kubrick-truly-seemed-to-know-things/.
LikeLike