The free use of ‘humanoid’

(https://www.zerohedge.com/political/1958-psychological-warfare-plan-playing-out-us#comment_stream)

“The useful idiots can’t understand the word “sociopath.” It’s not name-calling. It’s simply their actions don’t match their words. The 96% vastly out-number the 4% who are sociopaths, but since the word isn’t written on their forehead, the good people who don’t understand the word “sociopath” have no self-defense.  4% of 330 million is a little over 13 million. That’s a lot of people who have no empathy nor a conscience. Wise up and defend yourselves by not doing business with sociopaths.

PW:  The four percent, I believe, comes from Martha Stout’s cited researchers, Are we living through an unrecognized double black swan event?  I wouldn’t be a bit surprised if it was even higher.

I’ve practically given up on the useful idiot humanoids.  I came across this free use of the word humanoid not long ago and have adopted it for both descriptive and pejorative uses (after all native speakers can’t make a mistake).  Thus psychopaths could be termed psychopathic humanoids, pod people humanoids, reptiloid humanoids, rapetiloid humanoids, lizard lothario h’noids, don iquana h’noids, Rosemary’s Baby Daddy h’noids, decepticon h’noids, etc.  The sky and imagination and desired focus are the limit.  

The Eloi become the useful idiot humanoids, the plant eater humanoids,  the amoeba humanoids, the retardus Americanus humanoids who can’t even protect their own daughters from perv doctors, the see no evil humanoids, etc., etc.  https://pathwhisperer.info/2020/01/23/adelphoparasites-reptiloids-romeo-lizards-etc/

Every adult should know that they have almost certainly known dozens of psychopaths and probably deal with them every day.  Psychological warfare, on a person to person level, is their bread and butter.”

Some people might object to the word ‘rapetiloid’ above.  By statutory law, yes what male psychopaths do is seduction.  However by natural law (and I would never expect any psychopath to understand the concept of natural law) what they commit is at a minimum mind rape under false pretenses, there is absolutely no soul celebration taking place.  No more than if they were alien illusionists seeking Earth girls who were vulnerable and easy.  Under natural law the psychopathic seducer could be justifiably killed by a father, brother or the seducee herself.  Of course the seducee might respond by “Oh, I can’t stay angry at him, he’s just a little boy.’

Are we living through an unrecognized double black swan event?

First — it is now possible to objectively/scientifically recognize psychopaths (which will, I’m convinced, support Martha Stout’s cited estimate of 4% or 1 in 25 being a psychopath, ((K. Barry et al. (1997), R. Bland, S. Newman, H. Orn (1988), J. Samuels et al. (1994)), and my anecdotal agreement (from recognizing psychopaths waiting for the subway, at street corners, in the workplace, etc.).  Second — their unhappy response to this, i.e., their machinations to seize power over the rest of us – political, economic, and through the surveillance built into the internet of things of great utility and convenience.  Surveillance that can close like a vise on any chosen target.  We carry our own handcuffs with us.

“If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face – forever.” – George Orwell.  The Fabian, George Orwell, was a psychopath writing how-to books, as was Aldous Huxley also.  H.G. Wells of The Time Machine with the Eloi and Morlocks was also a Fabian and a psychopath.  The books seem to understand our plight from our own standpoint but only because psychopaths have something called “cold empathy.”  They know exactly how their targets will experience their attacks, it helps them ‘twist the stiletto’.

See the two prior posts (A hearsay tale involving Andrew Cuomo, and Commenter: “To borrow your own phrase, this nonsense has got to stop, one cannot recognize psychopaths by sight” — but, but, what if you are actually doing so without knowing it? (Mark Zuckerberg, in this case)).

Think what 1 in 25 being psychopaths mean.  It means that for every group of 25 that you’ve ever known, there was probably one psychopath.  It means we all walk shoulder to shoulder everyday with psychopathic beings who have zero fellow human feelings, emotionless, guiltless beings who see our emotional responses as weakness and know how to use them against us.

So why don’t we all know this?  I see two reasons.  First, as psychopaths always say (and I’ve heard them say this personally),we all believe what we want to believe.  Nobody wants to recognize Dad as a psychopath or Mom, bro or sis.  They just have issues and will put their lives together very soon, any day now.  Second, we should ask The New Yorker why they published the Psychopathic Whisperer, oopsie, my bad, the Psychopath Whisperer, Kent Kiehl’s drivel of psychopaths being so rare most people will never know any.  Who and what is The New Yorker? (https://pathwhisperer.info/2018/01/23/trust-me-im-a-doctor-this-is-a-medical-treatment-psychopath-larry-nassar-md-molests-young-female-gymnasts-for-20-plus-years/#comment-139406).

Commenter: “To borrow your own phrase, this nonsense has got to stop, one cannot recognize psychopaths by sight” — but, but, what if you are actually doing so without knowing it? Let’s look at Mark Zuckerberg.

Regarding Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook, would you say his looks are odd?  His eyes strange?  Would you say, or understand why someone else might describe his eyes as flat or shallow?  Would you say, or understand why someone else might say there was no soul behind his eyes?  Would you say, or understand why someone else might say the phrase, ‘the lights are on, but nobody is home”?  Does he seem arrogant to you?   Almost emotionless?  Personality-less?

Any ‘yes’, means you are on the way.  That’s how recognizing psychopaths start.

“Dumb F–ks”: Julian Assange Reminds Us What Mark Zuckerberg Thinks Of Facebook Users

“Julian Assange fired off a tweet Friday afternoon reminding people of the time Mark Zuckerberg called his users “Dumb fucks” because they trusted him with their private information. 

Zuck: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard

Zuck: Just ask.

Zuck: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS

[Redacted Friend’s Name]: What? How’d you manage that one?

Zuck: People just submitted it.

Zuck: I don’t know why.

Zuck: They “trust me”

Zuck: Dumb fucks.

Wake up, Eloi.

Is Mark Zuckerberg’s wardrobe that of a genius… or psychopath?

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/the-filter/is-mark-zuckerbergs-wardrobe-that-of-a-geniusor-psychopath/

Please note, Facebook has just shut down Alex Jones Infowars’ sites and Venezuelan sites.  It doesn’t matter what you think of these sites, next time it could be you.  The war begins.

What??  What’s that voice in the back?  “You’re wrong.  Mark is simply a nice Jewish boy!”  Ah.  . . .  No, you are the one who’s wrong.  The reason you think that, is due to psychopathy being another genetic disorder carried in higher percentages in the Ashkenazi population.  Plain and simple.  It is not anti-Semitism to note this.  In fact it should be freeing.  When a young person suddenly realizes that a parent is a psychopath, they are suddenly freed from the dictates of the parent/child power relationship, and can proceed to explore life unhindered by the anchor of the psychopathic parent.

Naive Prey Response Syndrome

In nature, this refers to prey animals not being able to recognize predators.  When wolves were reintroduced to Yellow Stone the elk were not able at first to recognize them as a danger.  Animals isolated on islands, are famous for this syndrome and often are not able to change fast enough, for example, the flightless pigeon, the Dodo, which sailors could just walk up to and hit on the head.

We are all raised to be naive prey of psychopaths.  Everyone is told the fairytale that we are all brothers and sisters under the skin.  But what if that is not so?  And it is not.  Believe me, psychopaths believe we are all idiots for not recognizing them.

On top of that, the human female starts out as genetically inclined to be naive prey to psychopaths.  Male psychopaths have evolved to evoke genetically determined instincts (mothering and caring-of-a-child instincts) in women, I believe.  Life can teach them otherwise, as attested in the survivor blogs.  However, all men need to be aware of the female propensity to be naive regarding psychopaths, it might prevent traumatic shock.  The truth is, you can’t save Weena.

From a later comment:

Here’s an account of early firearm buffalo hunts. I can’t vouch for its historical/biological accuracy, but it does convey a message. It goes like this, 1) the buffalo of the time didn’t and couldn’t recognize guns and gunshots as being dangerous (naive prey syndrome), 2) buffalo herds follow a dominant female, with a pecking order. So the hunter would lie down in some kind of blind, maybe just behind a log. Experienced hunters would know how to recognize the dominant female. So he would target that one. The others couldn’t fathom what had happened and couldn’t act on their own without a herd leader. Then the next in line dominant female would step up to be herd leader. Then she was shot, and the process continued over and over again, with the herd never panicking. The hunter wouldn’t ever have to move. “HEY, what happened to Martha? And Ethel? What the hay?? Dunno, just keep eating that grass, munch, munch, munch.  Wow, that’s some delicious grass!”  https://pathwhisperer.info/2018/05/07/annoying-neighborhood-psychopaths-and-anomalous-occurrences/#comment-139279

. . . munch, munch, . . ., munch, munch, munch.